Ludo King

• Buy 100 Game diamonds — $0.99
• Buy 10K Game Coins — $1.19
• Buy 10L Game Coins — $11.99
• Buy 1L Game Coins — $4.99
• Buy 2000 Game diamonds — $9.99
• Buy 25K Game Coins — $1.19
• Buy 50K Game Coins — $2.49
• Buy 5L Game Coins — $7.49
• King Pass (No Ads & More) — $9.99
• Spin and Get Premium Rewards — $2.49

Last verified 5 Sep 2026

3.7 18938 ratings · App Store

1. 1/5Game is rigged

   Probability is not random, in one game a player can get 6-8 rolls of six while you only get one or two in the first quarter then they pull ahead. Also, all three other players for 4 player can get the exact number to kill you but when it’s your turn, it never comes. The game is totally rigged. Many times other players all get three or two sixes in a row and pull ahead while I only get one or two and it does this repeatedly. Then when they all go in to win, they start getting low numbers and no more high numbers so they can win and you get the big numbers which are invalid once you make it home. This game is absolutely awful. Shame on the developers!!! Edit: The so called Random Number Generator is obviously faulty or is not being executed well as there is no way to get 3 to five consecutive sixes and keep getting high numbers while others get low ones. Fix the gd system! The so called random mess is forced!

   Peas is not good · 5 Sep 2026

2. 3/5No way this is truly random

   I have two main gripes with this app. I have played regular Ludo on a physical board and the experience is so vastly different it’s not even funny. I don’t care how loudly they say that this is a certified random number generator, there is simply no way that is true. I would say that their certification authority is highly dubious. The second bigger issue I have is with online play with strangers. The game usually gives a win to those who finish in the top three in a four person game. However, towards the end of the game the people who are in losing positions end up dropping out prematurely, so if I end up finishing third among the remaining three people, or second of two remaining people, it gives me a loss. Why should I be penalized just because somebody chose to drop out? The game started off with four people so I should be given a win based on that yardstick. I can forgive the random number generator issues because the game is fun regardless, but the second issue I cannot forgive.

   Podros · 6 Aug 2026

3. 1/5This is a poorly designed strategy game

   I have played the game many times and these are my observations: 1) When someone is close to your house, your dice gets 6. 2) When you are about to win and your piece is close to the end, your dice starts getting small numbers until what you need is 1. 3) When you are neck on neck with someone and you have one piece each left, you don’t win until the two of you are in the last box and you both are looking for 1. 4) The game puts you at a disadvantage when you are in the lead. Your game start showing the Wifi sign meaning you are not connected. Meanwhile, I always have nothing less than 20Mbps. This is either a problem with the game or some people have learnt to hack the game to have an advantage over others. 5) I have played games where someone hacked the game and moved their piece freely almost 10 spots or more without any restriction while they laughed at the rest of us on the game. I made screenshots and a recording of that game. When we wanted to leave, the WiFi sign came up and the game hanged. We all eventually left the game for the guy to take all our coins. 6) The moves are almost predictable and the game always decides who to win regardless the strategy you adopt. I don’t think the developers of this game are serious at all. GIVE ME MY CROWN! I won a game and you haven’t given me my crown!😭😭😭😭😭😭

   Toxadey · 5 Sep 2026

4. 1/5Lazy and stupid algorithm. Lack of coding skills

   Let me start my platitude that I have played this game in excess of multiple times with various techniques and strategies yet the game is so one-sided, I can't envision. For instance, you possibly escape the house when other player's token reaches or is close to your home. After that as soon as u get out, the player directly behind you, cuts you off and you return back home. Another model, when you are going to arrive at home (end) and you just need 1, however it takes forever to get that 1. However the other player who has 2 tokens out in center arrives at home and dominates the match. Presently this game idiotic and one-sided. The game designers needs to change entire calculation from start and make dice progressively irregular. I would energetically suggest looking at ludo all star. Any ludo game is superior to this game. Just to tell you the game isn't succeeding in light of the fact that you made it incredible, it's simply the individuals like ludo (genuine table game) and they need to interface with family who live far, get an opportunity to play game and have great time. This game is suppose to satisfy individuals not distraught. On the off chance that I were you I would attempt to alter the game in at any rate conceivable to make it better. However, inn any case after the quarantine is finished, nobody is going to give a damm about this game.

   Hardy_X · 5 Sep 2026

5. 4/5Fun game

   It’s fun to play this game with friends and family during these uncertain times. This game really keeps us in touch and with all the fun we usually have when we are together. The only change that this game requires is one rule. No peg should be able to enter the target unless, atleast one of the opponents peg is removed at some point of the game. Hey, what’s the point and fun in winning the game if you don’t remove atleast one peg of the opponent. The peg should stop moving at the entrance of the target, if the player has failed to kill atleast one of the opponents peg. Once, the player does that, then the peg should move inside the target. It would be great to add this feature to the game. And that’s how we used to play as kids on our Ludo board.

   Sujju 9 · 5 Sep 2026

Privacy

Accessibility

No accessibility labels collected yet.